latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-unions12-2010jan12,0,419808.story
latimes.com
Labor leaders object to 'Cadillac tax' for healthcare
A dozen of them meet with President Obama to voice opposition to the
proposal, which the president supports. One says union members could skip
November's election if they don't get their way.
By Peter Nicholas
January 12, 2010
Reporting from Washington
Underscoring a rift in the Democratic political coalition, national labor
leaders met with President Obama on Monday and raised objections to a proposed
tax that they said would harm union members and cause a backlash in the November
midterm election.
Obama has come out in favor of the "Cadillac tax" that
is part of the healthcare bill passed by the Senate. The tax, meant to help
finance the healthcare overhaul, would apply to the most expensive insurance
plans.
The House has an alternative: a new surtax on single taxpayers
making more than $500,000 a year and couples earning more than $1 million. The
two bodies are working out a compromise in private.
The dozen labor
leaders, who spent two hours with Obama and White House officials, said they
preferred the surtax on wealthy Americans, according to a person familiar with
the meeting who was not authorized to discuss it publicly.
They also told
Obama that the healthcare "exchanges" envisioned in the bill, intended to help
many Americans buy insurance policies, should be national in scope -- not
state-based -- so as to provide more competition for the insurance industry, the
person said.
Participants included James P. Hoffa of the Teamsters,
Richard Trumka of the AFL-CIO and Gerald McEntee of the American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees.
The White House gave no details on
the meeting except to call it "productive." A spokesman for one of the labor
leaders in attendance said the White House had asked the unions not to discuss
the meeting with the news media. As a candidate in 2008, Obama promised that
healthcare negotiations would take place amid unprecedented transparency. That
hasn't happened.
Labor leaders have warned that the Senate tax, if left
intact, would amount to a middle-class tax increase -- something Obama had
promised to avoid. They contend the tax would hit everyday workers who are
covered by expensive insurance plans and who in many cases gave up wage
increases to get the health coverage in hard-fought
negotiations.
Appearing at the National Press Club on Monday before the
meeting with Obama, Trumka told reporters that organized labor -- which was
crucial to the Democrats' election victories in 2008 -- might stay home in the
midterm election this fall if the healthcare bill is not to their
liking.
"I think there's that chance" that union members will boycott the
election, Trumka said.
In his speech at the press club, Trumka said: "The
tax on benefits in the Senate bill pits working Americans who need healthcare
for their families against working Americans struggling to keep healthcare for
their families. This is a policy designed to benefit elites -- in this case,
insurers, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and irresponsible employers -- at
the expense of the broader public."
Many healthcare economists believe
that such a tax will help restrain healthcare spending by discouraging
overutilization of services by people who have to pay very little for the care
they receive.
A compromise may be in the offing. Democratic negotiators
are exploring a possibility that would not eliminate the tax entirely, but raise
the threshold at which it applies in order to ensure that more middle-income
Americans are spared.
To make up the lost revenue, Democrats might boost
the Medicare payroll tax on high-income Americans.
The Joint Committee on
Taxation estimated last month that the "Cadillac tax" would generate nearly $149
billion over the next decade. Much of that would come from income taxes paid by
workers, under the assumption that businesses would trim back health plans to
avoid the new tax, then raise wages to make up the difference to their
employees.
House Democrats rejected the tax amid pressure from labor and
other interest groups.
peter.nicholas@latimes.com
Noam
N. Levey in the Washington bureau contributed to this report.
Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times